Saturday, June 23, 2007

Saturday What Are They?

What kind of beans are these?

Friday, June 15, 2007

Friday Planting

Planted today:

- 14 ft of 'Kentucky Blue' pole beans, single row, about 4 inches apart
- 14 ft of 'Royal Burgundy' bush beans, single row, about 4 inches apart
- 55 ft of 'Envy' soybeans (edimame), pretty much a single row, 4 inches apart

Also did the usual weeding. If nothing else, there's always weeding to do. I'm very glad I'm finally at that point where I can say that. This is new.

The soybeans are about 3 years old (i.e., they were packaged for 2004), so I'm not sure if they're going to come up. But I planted a whole bunch of them -- a few hundred -- so I'm hoping that a few will come up so I can save seed for next spring (and maybe even a very late fall planting).

Here are some pics:


'Liana' pole beans seedlings planted next to yucca flower stalks


An 'Early Sweet' pie pumpkin seedling down in the bottom of this can. I'm trying the can to see if that protects the seedlings from the quail. This seedling is also growing in the 50/50 mix of peat and pig manure.



This is the row in which I planted the beans listed above.


This is the order I placed with Johnny's today. It includes 3 beans, 2 greens, and 6 lettuces.

Sunday, June 03, 2007

Sunday False Flag?

The way to keep the majority of the population in fear is to put these little tidbits out from time to time. This keeps them on edge and fearful. Is the recent pipeline bombing plot a mini false flag?

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/014434.php

Sunday, May 27, 2007

Sunday Pretty Pics

Here are some pics of a friends' cactus, plus a cicada I spied while tromping around today.







Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Tuesday Dichotomy

I'm at a low point, but all around me continues to be great and beautiful.

I nice storm blew through a few days ago and I snapped some incredible shots of the lightening. Hope you enjoy them.








Saturday, April 21, 2007

Saturday Flowers

Pretty flowers up at the stronghold....

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

Tuesday Stronghold

Heading up to the Stronghold this morning. Been looking forward to this "trip" for quite a while. It's a 20 minute drive, but we never seem to make the time to get up there. But now's the time to do it with all the wildflowers coming out. I'm hoping to get a pretty nice show.

I'll post some pics here and vids on YouTube (and link to them here).

Until later.....

Monday, April 09, 2007

Monday Lettuce

First harvest of lettuce this year. These are 'Black Seeded Simpson' that self-sowed and came up on their own. I cut off a few of the outer leaves of the largest plant, chopped them up, and had them on my burrito for lunch:


Monday Garden Update

The garden is doing well. Here's what's in the ground and/or coming up and or established:

Sunflowers
Soybeans
Strawberries (three different varieties)
Almond tree
Kiwi vine
Grape vine (two different varieties)
Blueberry bush
Lettuce (several varieties)
Peas ('Caseload' and 'Snowpea')
Arugula
Chard
Onions (yellow and red - from sets)
Amaranth
Tomato seedlings (volunteers)
Mustard
Tatsoi
Greenbeans of some sort
Pinto beans
Garbanzo beans
Black beans
Broad beans
Snow beans
Mung beans
Carrots ('Mokum' and 'Cosmic Purple')
Radishes (two varieties sofar)
Beets (two varieties sofar)
Corn ('Mexican June' and 'Painted Mountain' sofar)
Cuke (poinsette 76)
Crenshaw melon
Brocholli
Kohlrabi
Potatoes
Spinach
Cabbage

Thursday, April 05, 2007

Thursday Green

So I saw a green "contrail" or "cloud" today.

The first picture is what came out of the camera:




The 2nd picture, all I did was change the brightness and contrast:

Tuesday, April 03, 2007

Tuesday Sunrise & "Contrails"

Nice sunrise, except for that eyesore:





Monday, April 02, 2007

Monday Paradigm Shift

Allright -- so I'm undergoing a paradigm shift. David Hawkins has it right, even though I still can't be sure of the basis for his statements -- kinesiology. But that almost doesn't matter since this is all "perception" anyhow.

In Power vs. Force, Hawkins describes a 'Map of Consciousness' and goes into elaborate detail as to what this means and how it shows up in the world. At the moment, I don't have the necessary words to describe my thoughts on this, but the paradigm is very much in alignment with my own thoughts and experiences.

I see attractor patterns everywhere and practically all the time. The more I look for them, the more of them I see. This is especially true in my own behavior (which, of course, comes from my thoughts which originate in consciousness).

Unfortunately, at the moment, I exist in a very "negative" energy field. I'm in guilt, shame, apathy, grief, fear, desire, anger, and pride most of the time. On occasion, I peek into courage and neutrality. Rare is willingness, acceptance, reason, and love. Nearly non-existent is joy and peace.

An example of this is how I, up until yesterday, viewed the universe. I've experienced situations that seem to repeat. It's as if the universe is trying to teach me something. So it throws something at me and sees how I react. If I react "correctly", then the situation never (or rare) repeats. If I react "incorrectly", then I'll get a repeat usually as quickly as the next day -- but sometimes sooner. I've thought of these situations as challenges, as if the universe is saying, "ok, buddy, whatcha gonna do with this?".

But now I see that these aren't challenges. The universe doesn't operate that way, even though from my negative energy level I might perceive it to be that way. The universe is actually in a constant state of giving. So -- instead of challenging me, I'm now seeing that the universe is trying to help me. Help me do what? Choose positive energy over negative energy. Simple as that.

My usual reaction to an unwanted situation is to get angry. I do this very well -- I'm an expert. But this reaction doesn't resolve the situation, and in fact it usually makes it worse. This is because anger is a negative energy. If, instead, I react with a positive energy (in most cases, I can go with neutrality), then the situation ends and I move on unharmed and in fact feeling pretty good about myself. My energy level has been slightly raised and that gives me a nice rush.

So why not always go for the positive energy reactions to things? Bad habits. I'm not use to seeking out positive energy.

Well, onward and upward.

Monday Managing

Here's some pics of the garden as of yesterday:





Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Wednesday Dusty

A dusty morning because of all the wind, but I was there to witness (and record!) a spectacular sunrise:

Saturday, March 24, 2007

Saturday Sunny

A nice day today after a few days of rain. "Nice" isn't accurate, of course, since I enjoy the rain as much as the sun. But you know what I mean.

Got a new camera the other day. It's a beaut! Look at this mint!!!!



I'm also YouTubing these days. The camera comes with a video option with very excellent sound:

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Tuesday Equinox

Happy Equinox!

My digital camera died the other day. An expected event. So I'll be getting another one fairly soon -- whenever I get back into town. I suppose I could order online, but I'm a tactile person and need to actually "feel" things like that before I buy them.

I want the camera to document the explosion of wakefulness out here in the desert that we're experiencing. Everything is waking up from a 3 month dormancy.

A big change is about to occur. Should be exciting. They always are.

Thursday, March 08, 2007

Thursday Buds

Oh yeah, the almond tree that we planted early last fall is showing signs of life! This is a very nice thing since I was very worried about it making it through the winter. The buds are beginning to swell and change color. In another week or so I'm expecting flowers! Totally cool!

Here are some bud pics:




And ok, the perty sunrise from this morning....

Thursday Admit

The only thing I find relevant to post to the blog is pics and comments about the chemtrails. All of my other inner most thoughts and actions are written down in my private journal. Y'all don't wanna know (nor do you care) what I'm really thinking about.

Anyhow -- more chem pics from yesterday. A busy morning indeed! Here's an example:

Monday, March 05, 2007

Monday Chems

Actually, these pics were taken a few days ago:



Monday, February 26, 2007

Monday: Peas, Carrots, Onions

The peas and onions are popping up, but no carrots yet.

The alfalfa farm down the road has started watering, which means they're thinkin' it's time for everything to start a-growin'. I'm not arguing.

Full throttle.

Thursday, February 08, 2007

Thursday Got 'Em

Yesterday afternoon, my friends up in the air were busy. Two very low (I'd estimate 30,000ft) planes went right over me with their spray. I caught the 2nd one with my camera. The following images are cropped from the original images to just show the plane:









Also, using the RGB colors of the camera, I can do some very low spectral resolution analysis:



The green line is the background sky. The red line is the "chemtrail". The dark blue line is the fuseloge of the plane. The purple line is the wing of the plane. What this shows is that the plane's underside is quite bright in the red and green, and pretty dark in the blue -- relatively speaking.

Wednesday, February 07, 2007

Wednesday Photons

If one looks at a photon as a particle moving through space, we all know that it travels at C, the velocity of light. However, when it passes through a prism, it slows down and this is what causes the rainbow effect we see.

Allright -- so what it the velocity of the photon after it leaves the prism? I can understand what slows it down, but what speeds it up again after it leaves the prism?

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

Tuesday Radar

Allright -- so explain this one. Here is the radar "image" (1km) from 2216 UTC:



And here is the visible light image (1km) taken at 2215 UTC -- contrast enhanced and cropped so the image is about the same area as the radar shown above:




Now -- if there's such a huge and strong radar "echo", why doesn't it correlate with the visible satellite image?

Could this be the "chaff" that is talked about so much? If you look at a radar animation for the past several hours, there are other little "clouds" moving around. I haven't correlated them with any sat image, but I'd guess that they're as un-correlated as the big blob.

So I guess I'll be watching this blob, too, as it makes its way across my beautiful desert.

Sons of bitches....

Tuesday Busy Sky

A very busy sky over southern calif and baja:



Are there really that many flights from LA to somewhere in Mexico every day?

This is a 1km resolution image that I've enhanced to boost the contrast a bit so the trails can be easily seen.

Parallel trails, fairly equally spaced. I count at least 12 of them. Not sure if they were formed at the same time or sequencially. I'm keeping an eye on this area today and will see what happens.

Sons of bitches....

Sunday, February 04, 2007

Sunday Please Explain

Ok, folks, I want someone to explain this sequence of two images taken a few hours ago off the Pacific coast of California.

Picture 1, taken at 13:30 UTC:



... and Picture 2, taken at 14:00 UTC:



Both of these are with the IR camera. Now -- in Picture 1, there is clearly only one "contrail", while in Picture 2 there is clearly two "contrails". The 2nd "contrail" in Picture 2 is most likely the upper one. It is approximately 181.01 pixels in length. Each pixel is 4km in size, so therefore the length of this "contrail" is approx 724km.

No problem, UNTIL one also realizes that this "contrail" was formed in 30 minutes. Let's assume it took exactly 30 minutes to form this "contrail". This means that the aircraft that created this "contrail" was traveling at 1448 km/hour -- or about 869 mph. Yep -- supersonic.

Sons of bitches.....

There's a lot of additional activity just to the north of these "contrails", also, which is why when I was watching the Weather Channel this morning it caught my eye.

Here's a visible image taken at the same time. The two "contrails" shown above are actually even more clear -- and I've included the activity to the north:

first at 13:30 UTC:




and then at 14:00 UTC:

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Tuesday Chem

More chemtrails yesterday:





Friday, January 26, 2007

Friday Bath

I take a water sprayer and get one of the birds a little wet. She then proceeds to give herself a complete bath. At least I'm able to influence someone!

Friday STD

What is the ONE precondition for acquiring a sexually transmitted disease?

You're so smart? You're right -- SEX!

HIV/AIDS is obviously a big problem in the world, but no one seems to ever talk about the most important issue. They talk about drugs that can "cure" AIDS or at least slow it down. That's great. The work that's going on there is helping us understand how viruses work and how we can hopefully someday deal with them.

But the one big issue that no one seems to talk about (maybe because it's taboo????) is that HIV/AIDS (for the most part) is a behavioral disease. To be blunt, there's a lot of people out there fucking each other's brains out. Until this behavior is modified (through education, and maybe even more effective -- bribery), the scourge of HIV/AIDS and other STDs will continue to grow until all the idiots are eliminated. That's just how nature works.

You see, I can't get HIV/AIDS if I stand around thinking about sex. I little insect can't bite me and suddenly I'm infected (unlike other nasty diseases). The little HIV critter can't survive (or so I've been told) in air -- so it's not floating around my house waiting for me to breathe it in. But if I go around fucking anything that moves (for whatever reason -- dominance over women, "addicted to sex", etc.), then I can pretty much guarantee that I'm going to acquire some kind of STD.

Are the people in Africa being told this? I have no idea -- no one ever talks about it.

Friday Evade

There's another option: Fight Anonymously. Is something like this possible? Can one fight while staying completely anonymous and hidden? Maybe for a while, but one must remember that the adversary is very determined and will do anything to both get into the fight and then "win".

What do they want and why do they want it? No real idea. Power? Control? Money? But really - WHY? I'm sure they realize that holding on to this kind of "power" takes a LOT of work and effort -- and you've got to step on a LOT of toes (to say the least) to keep it.

There's a better way. Seek and acquire love. Then you'll have more than everything you need.

Friday Chaff

Some links to reports on "RF Chaff":

https://www.denix.osd.mil/denix/Public/Library/Rfchaff/rfchaff.html

On the couple of reports I've read, there's no mention as to how high in the atmosphere this chaff is released. I'd like to find out what the range in altitude is.

So -- is this the answer to the "chemtrail" question? Probably not. But I'm going to keep my eye on the sky as well as the radar to try to see this stuff when it's released into my air. Chemtrails are most likely aerosols rather than fibers.

Thursday, January 25, 2007

Thursday Alex Jones

Just watched Alex Jones' "Terror Storm". I was told that this movie was "pretty intense", and I'd agree with that. The movie speaks of propaganda (amoung many other things), but my only complaint is that I'd suggest that this very movie is a form of propaganda. But that's ok, IMO, since what he's trying to do is find the truth -- or at least all of the facts.

Movies like this scare the HELL out of me, not only because of the delivery method, but more importantly the content. So -- what can be done? I see three options:

  • Ignore
  • Fight
  • Evade

If Ignore, then you become the victim of whatever is happening to you -- not wise. If Fight, then you become a clear target -- not pretty. If Evade, then you get away with things for a while but will eventually be found -- at which point you become a target. I prefer evasion because it buys me time, but I have to accept the fact that those who want to control are very determined and most likely won't give up until all are either controlled or eliminated.

Take tax evasion as an example. It would take the IRS at least a few years to "figure out" that someone is evading paying taxes. It may then take at least another year for the IRS to build a case, and yet another year to begin the process of trying to get their money. So from the moment a person decides to evade paying taxes, it might be upwards of five years until you become a clear target.

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Tuesday and Snow

Great amount of snow yesterday. Here are some pics:


Also, some pics of Joshua trees that I took on my way to Las Vegas:

Vegas, BTW, is a bore to those of us who have better things to do. As with most places, the best part of being there is knowing that I'll be leaving.

Tuesday, January 16, 2007

Tuesday Tokens

Big fucking deal.


The so-called Democrats in the House of Representatives did their "100 hour" legislative process. Here's what they've apparently passed:


  • Implementing the 9/11 Commission Recommendations Act of 2007
  • Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007
  • Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007
  • Medicare Prescription Drug Price Negotiation Act of 2007
  • College Student Relief Act of 2007 (whoops, they didn't pass this one yet)
  • CLEAN Energy Act of 2007 (whoops, didn't pass this one yet either!)

Impressive? Sure -- if you don't know ANYTHING about the legislative process. You see, first a bill is introduced into the House or Senate. It's debated (or not) and either passes or fails. Sometimes at the same time, a similar bill introduced at the same time in the other body or, more likely, the passed legislation is moved to the other body. Here it's debated again and voted upon, and it either passes or fails. If it passes, the bill then goes into conference, where the two bodies debate even more. If it gets through this, then both bodies vote again. If the bill passes, it goes to the president for his/her signature -- which he/she doesn't necessarily have to do.


SO --- the "100 hour marathon" is a token and an acknowledgement that the rabble that calls itself the USA "citizenry" really has no idea what's going on.

Tuesday and more Iran Crap

Here's what our esteemed new Sec of Defence had to say about Iran (from a recent transcript:

"The Iranians clearly believe that we're tied down in Iraq; that they have the initiative, that they are in a position to press us in many ways. They are doing nothing to be constructive in Iraq at this point. In addition, they have supported Hezbollah's efforts to create a new conflict in Lebanon and so the Iranians are acting in a very negative way in many respects. My view is that when the Iranians are prepared to play a constructive role in dealing with some of these problems, then there might be opportunities for engagement. Secretary Rice already has said that she would sit down any time, any place with her counterpart from Iran if they would commit not to enrich uranium.


So the opportunity is there for engagement, but I would say that the initiative needs to rest with the Iranians and we are simply trying to communicate to the region that we're going to be there for a long time."


Ok, Mr. Gates. Some questions for you. Please respond. The Iranians are in a position to press "us" (I assume you mean the government of the USA, or do you mean the people of the USA, or do you mean you and your family, or do you mean you and your co-workers? -- come to think of it, what do you mean by "us"? Is "us" a short way of saying USA?) in many respects. Let's see, "many" implies more than one -- so you've gotten away with that by listing TWO "respects" in which Iran is pressing "us".


So what, exactly, does playing a constructive role in Iraq entail? Or is it more to the point to say that Iran is playing a destructive role in Iraq? Maybe I could buy that if you could show a direct connection between the trouble in Iraq and citizens/government employees of Iran. And, if I may, play the "hypocrite" card, who are citizens/government employees of the USA supporting in destructive roles around the world, hmmmm? Allright -- so Iran is causing us trouble in Iraq and is therefore "pressing" us.


Hezbollah has been a thorn in the side of the middle east for years, or so I've come to understand. Didn't I read somewhere that it was even supported by the USA government at some point in the past? Amazing how, instead of directing "our" (I put that in quotes because I really mean the USA government) efforts at directing our activity at Hezbollah, we go after the supporters of Hezbollah. Kinda like knocking off the family of someone you want to "get" instead of knocking off the person you're really after.


Get real -- all you're doing (and most likely doing it well) is provoking a continuing escalation of hostilities. Right now, it's all just words. What exactly are words in the true physical sense? Words are a superposition of amplitudes and frequencies that are audible by the human ear. These "sounds" are picked up by the human ear and electrically transferred to the human brain. A series of algorithms have been written to "interpret" these electronic impulses and give them "meaning" to the human.


Need I tell you what's infinitely worse than words? Just in case you don't know -- nuclear bombs! These devices make quite a big mess -- as opposed to words that just spread out geometrically into the universe.

Tuesday, January 09, 2007

Tuesday Chemtrails

Well, they're at it again off the coast of California:


If they're not obvious, here's the same picture where I cropped out the trails:


... and the same thing contrast enhanced:


Each pixel in these images is 4km in size. The chemtrails shown here are about 3 pixels (12km) wide and in excess of 700km long! The image I get are 30 minuts apart and I can actually sit here and watch them pop up.

Something interesting about this picture (besides the trails). This is a VIS shot taken at night. If you look at the same time in IR, the trails don't appear:


Even goosing up the contrast doesn't let the pop out.

So what explains this? Well, moonlight maybe. But could they be glowing? Not sure. There are other features in this image that are obviously clouds that are also "glowing". In any case, it's pretty weird that they show up in the nighttime VIS and not the IR. There's likely to be spectral info there I suppose.

One thing I noticed is that the daylight images (a couple hours after these above were taken) show what appears to be a fog bank (some 300km x 300km in size) under (or over, not sure) the trails.

What are they doing? Why are they doing this? Who is doing this? Why are they doing it there?

And I've got my own chemtrails over my house today: